Safe Sex Essays - Sexual Health, HIVAIDS, Sexual Acts, Fertility

Safe Sex Numerous speculations and much examination has been directed on contraception all in all, also, more as of late on condoms specifically, because of the AIDS scourge (Lear, 1995). Condom use and AIDS training are basic instruments for lessening the effect of the infection, yet less than 33% of explicitly dynamic school understudies report reliable condom use (Seal and Palmer-Seal, 1996). It appears that explicitly dynamic people infrequently examine more secure sex or get some information about their accomplice's sexual action before participating in sexual movement (Seal and Palmer-Seal, 1996). This brings up certain issues with regards to the birthplace of the shirking of more secure sex conversation. It has been discovered that the relational responses of sexual accomplices, instead of the less immediate musings of AIDS hazard, impact perspectives towards condoms and condom use (Casteneda and Collins, 1995). These individual associations among accomplices in a sexual relationship are an outcome of mentalities each accomplice conveys about sex, contraception and a sexual relationship itself. Mentalities can be discovered by methods for individual discernment assessments, which present the practices of an objective individual (e.g., presenting a condom) and classify the social implications forced on the entertainer inside the circumstance (Castenada and Collins, 1995). So as to precisely assess the social implications inside a sexual relationship utilizing an individual observation worldview, the worldview itself, just as the correspondence designs about the relationship and condom use must be evaluated. Individual Perception Paradigm and This Study The adequacy of the individual recognition worldview for precisely gathering the social implications inferred by specific activities has been demonstrated in past research (Collins and Brief, 1995). It has been determined that target subject's practices inside a vignette are the establishment for impressions the members structure about the social implications of activities. Collins and Brief have proceeded to contend that the vignette system is better ready to gather the social implications got from activities than inquiries questions, on the grounds that frequently impressions that are shaped about another's activities are not cognizant demeanor arrangements. Conduct understanding frequently happen through programmed and natural implies (Collins, 1997; address). While most examination straightforwardly asks members what they think, individual recognition considers a progressively unobtrusive methods for picking up the members responses. The current examination utilized an individual discernment test to assess the mentalities of members about ladies in a sexual relationship when she either proposed a condom, or said nothing regarding contraception, while communicating either concern or saying nothing regarding her enthusiastic state. There were four various potential sorts of circumstances that the male eyewitnesses could have been given: the concerned female who didn't propose a condom, the concerned female who stated, I have a condom with me, the female who said nothing what's more, didn't propose a condom, and the female who said nothing regarding her passionate state, yet said she had a condom with her. These females were at that point assessed by male spectators on different parts of her apparent character. Guys evaluated the females on such things as, in the event that they were dynamic or uninvolved, if they were indiscriminate or not, and so on. No other exploration has tended to a sexual circumstance where ladies talk about their emotions and present a condom in an individual discernment worldview. It will be intriguing to perceive how the male members evaluate the circumstance. This investigation utilized six unique scales contained isolated things so as to precisely survey the discernments the male spectators held about the female targets. The scales were a Sexual allure scale, which decided how explicitly appealing the lady was, a Responsibility scale, which decided the degree to which the lady was capable, a Takes Charge scale, which surveyed the male spectator's thoughts regarding how dynamic the ladies in the circumstances were and two different scales which evaluated how Nice and Exciting the lady was. It is theorized that there will be high connections between's the separate things inside every one of these scales, which shows that the things will be estimating comparative properties. In any case, there will be low connections between's any two scales and between any things and a different scale, which will demonstrate that the scales were estimating various qualities. Past Research on the Person Recognition Paradigm Past examination has discovered that individuals do make decisions based on the preventative decisions that target people pick and the conditions they have settled on the decisions under, concerning premature birth choices (Allgeier, Allgeier and Rywick, 1979: as refered to in McKinney et al., 1987). It has additionally been found that prophylactic conduct is assessed diversely by an outside eyewitness that is presented to a vignette delineating a sexual circumstance including issues of contraception, and individual perspectives Safe Sex Essays - Sexual Health, HIVAIDS, Sexual Acts, Fertility Safe Sex Numerous hypotheses and much exploration has been led on contraception all in all, furthermore, more as of late on condoms specifically, because of the AIDS plague (Lear, 1995). Condom utilization and AIDS training are basic apparatuses for decreasing the effect of the ailment, yet less than 33% of explicitly dynamic school understudies report predictable condom use (Seal and Palmer-Seal, 1996). It appears that explicitly dynamic people once in a while examine more secure sex or get some information about their accomplice's sexual movement before participating in sexual action (Seal and Palmer-Seal, 1996). This brings up certain issues with respect to the birthplace of the shirking of more secure sex conversation. It has been discovered that the relational responses of sexual accomplices, as opposed to the less immediate considerations of AIDS hazard, impact perspectives towards condoms and condom utilization (Casteneda and Collins, 1995). These individual connections among accomplices in a sexual relationship are an outcome of mentalities each accomplice conveys about sex, contraception and a sexual relationship itself. Mentalities can be found out by methods for individual discernment assessments, which present the practices of an objective individual (e.g., presenting a condom) and order the social implications forced on the on-screen character inside the circumstance (Castenada and Collins, 1995). So as to precisely assess the social implications inside a sexual relationship utilizing an individual recognition worldview, the worldview itself, just as the correspondence designs about the relationship and condom use must be surveyed. Individual Perception Paradigm and This Study The viability of the individual observation worldview for precisely gathering the social implications suggested by specific activities has been demonstrated in past research (Collins and Brief, 1995). It has been discovered that target subject's practices inside a vignette are the establishment for impressions the members structure about the social implications of activities. Collins and Brief have proceeded to contend that the vignette technique is better ready to gather the social implications got from activities than inquiries questions, in light of the fact that frequently impressions that are shaped about another's activities are not cognizant demeanor arrangements. Conduct understanding frequently happen through programmed and natural implies (Collins, 1997; address). While most examination legitimately asks members what they think, individual observation contemplates a progressively unobtrusive methods for picking up the members responses. The current examination utilized an individual discernment test to assess the perspectives of members about ladies in a sexual relationship when she either proposed a condom, or said nothing regarding contraception, while communicating either concern or saying nothing regarding her enthusiastic state. There were four various potential sorts of circumstances that the male onlookers could have been given: the concerned female who didn't propose a condom, the concerned female who stated, I have a condom with me, the female who said nothing furthermore, didn't propose a condom, and the female who said nothing regarding her passionate state, however said she had a condom with her. These females were at that point assessed by male eyewitnesses on different parts of her apparent character. Guys evaluated the females on such things as, on the off chance that they were dynamic or latent, if they were unbridled or not, and so forth. No other examination has tended to a sexual circumstance where ladies talk about their emotions and present a condom in an individual observation worldview. It will be fascinating to perceive how the male members evaluate the circumstance. This investigation utilized six unique scales involved independent things so as to precisely survey the discernments the male onlookers held about the female targets. The scales were a Sexual allure scale, which decided how explicitly alluring the lady was, a Responsibility scale, which decided the degree to which the lady was dependable, a Takes Charge scale, which evaluated the male onlooker's thoughts regarding how dynamic the ladies in the circumstances were and two different scales which surveyed how Nice and Exciting the lady was. It is guessed that there will be high connections between's the separate things inside every one of these scales, which shows that the things will be estimating comparative properties. Be that as it may, there will be low relationships between's any two scales and between any things and a different scale, which will demonstrate that the scales were estimating various properties. Past Research on the Person Recognition Paradigm Past exploration has discovered that individuals do make decisions based on the prophylactic decisions that target people pick and the conditions they have settled on the decisions under, concerning fetus removal choices (Allgeier, Allgeier and Rywick, 1979: as refered to in McKinney et al., 1987). It has likewise been found that prophylactic conduct is assessed diversely by an outside onlooker that is presented to a vignette delineating a sexual

The Deadweight Loss

Tips for Editing Your Common App Essay TKG

Tips for Editing Your Common App Essay Have you been working on your Common App essay for weeks or months now? Are you feeling stuck, like you’ve written everything you’ve wanted to say but there’s no way to wrap it all up, or are you freaking out because it’s 1000 words and you need to get it down to 650? Whatever boat you’re in, don’t fear. Below you’ll find our basic guide to helping you out of a writing and editing rut so that you can finish your essay and send it off feeling confident it is polished and finally done.  Read here if you need to make big edits or rewrite sections:  First things first: take a break. Set down the essay and work on other things (supplements) for 3-5 days. You have time. After that time is up and you’ve had a breather, print your most recent draft out in double spaces. Seriously, please, print it out. In double spaces. The double spaces make sure you have room to edit.  Then reread slowly. Act like it’s a totally new piece of writing by a stranger and try to approach it as if you haven’t just spent two months working on it. And if you can, read it out loud. On this reread, there are two main goals:    Figure out what sentences feel clunky. Clunky sentences or phrases are ones that “stick out,” that sound unnatural or forced or like you didn’t say them but instead you read them in a textbook or in a 19th-century poem for English class. Mark those sections of the essay. When you are done reading, circle back and try to explain aloud what you’re attempting to say in each section. Write down what you mean, and see if you can insert that explanation instead of the original clunky language. (Note: Don’t worry as much about word count here. You can write what you need to write and go back later to pare down.)  Figure out what is repetitive. This is a short essay, so you don’t want to be saying the same thing over and over again in different ways, no matter how good you think each way you say it sounds. One helpful tip for finding places you ne ed to edit is to check whether you can summarize any of your sentences, paragraphs, or ideas. If you do, then you need to rewrite those parts or simply cut them out.    Read here if you’re struggling with one nasty paragraph or with finding your conclusion:Take another step back. Ask yourself what you’re trying to get across in that section. What’s its “point”? What question do you still need to answer here? What’s missing? Then try doing a 20-minute free-write to answer the question. Don’t criticize what you think here before you have it down on paper. This is just a way to get random thoughts out about the section or conclusion. Once you’ve done those 20 minutes, look back at what you’ve written to see whether you’ve come up with anything that you can now insert into the piece. This can be especially helpful for the ending, rather than trying over and over again to get that perfect last line and falling short every time, or landing on something cheesy that you hate.If the 20-minute free-write isn’t working for you, you can try to think about the overall structure and goals for the pieceâ€"â€"the ideas you want your readers to come away with. Then get a trusty friend or two to read it over and ask them what they came away with. Does it match up with your goals?  Read here if you’re struggling with making the piece a lot shorter:Don’t start small here. Instead, think about whole paragraphs or sentences that are either repetitive, rambly, or random. If you don’t know why a sentence is in the essay, it probably shouldn’t be in there. Think in phrases, rather than in whole sentences, and don’t be afraid to chop things up. Once you’ve really slashed what you need to, and you have fewer than 50 words until you’re under the word limit, you can then try to go through each sentence and find extraneous words.  Read here if you’re heading towards your final draft:After you’ve worked out those bigger issues, you can reprint (!) you r newest draft and start looking for smaller places to edit. One major goal before getting to your last draft is to go through the essay and see whether you use the same words in multiple places. Do you see yourself saying “I love X” and then “I love Y,” or “great,” “good,” “nice” in different places? Those words aren’t actually descriptive, so in those cases, try to diversify and get more specific and exact.  But there’s a trap hereâ€"â€"don’t just thesaurus-ize your essay. Do you see yourself saying “myriad,” “multitude,” “innumerable” “plethora”? Chances are, those words don’t sound like you. At the end of the day, this essay is still about you and you’re trying to get your voice across. So go carefully through the piece and make sure you’re using genuine and honest vocabulary: things you can hear yourself saying in a conversation with parents, teachers, or friends.  Okay, so how do I wrap everything up?  Once you have moved through this process above, we strongly suggest printing the piece out a final time and reading it aloud again to make sure everything flows the way you want it to. If you’re still getting stuck, start from part 1 again (ie. taking a break and looking back at the piece as a fresh, new reader). Or if you’re more of a perfectionist type, remember that this piece is ultimately just trying to get you into college. It is supposed to represent your voice, but it doesn’t need to represent your whole life. Be sensitive and thoughtful with your writing process, but don’t obsess endlessly.  And last, once you feel like you’re finally done but before throwing up your hands and never thinking about the essay again, please double-triple check to make sure you’ve followed the Common App’s instructions and requirements about how to upload, your max/min word count, and your formatting. You don’t want to be furiously fixing those things at 11:59pm the night before everything is sent in.     If you are still having a ton of trouble brainstorming, writing, or editing your essay, reach out to us here. It’s our job to guide students through the essay-writing process.